Kal-EL
12-07-2009, 05:12 AM
http://tpucdn.com/images/news/intel.gif (javascript:g_relatednews.showicon(110005))
intel larrabee fails as a gpu project (http://www.overclockaholics.com/110005/intel_larrabee_fails_as_a_gpu_project.html)
intel's (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/#) ambitious attempts at building a discrete gpu have been shelved, as reports emerge of the company canceling the silicon's first implementation as a gpu, but rather as a "software (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/#) development platform for internal and external use." in a statement issued to internetnews.com, intel spokesperson nick knupffer explained the company's current position of larrabee, saying that development of larrabee's silicon (the chip) and software were behind schedules. "larrabee silicon and software development are behind where we hoped to be at this point in the project," he said. "as a result, our first larrabee product will not be launched as a stand-alone, discrete graphics product, rather it will be used as a software development platform for internal and external use."
larrabee as a discrete gpu made a lot of news in its short public-life, it was given much credibility as it was coming from intel, an it industry heavyweight. Earlier this year, intel demonstrated a larrabee-based product (including actual product design of the "larrabee card"), at last month's sc'09 show. The company seemed to have avoided calling it a discrete gpu, instead a "computational co-processor for the intel xeon (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/#) and core families." it was reasonable in calling it that, since by design, larrabee is a many-core processor (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/#) which uses 32 ia cores interconnected by caches. At sc'09, intel demonstrated its computational power which peaked at over 1 tflop, but not before overclocking it. » read full story (http://www.overclockaholics.com/110005/intel_larrabee_fails_as_a_gpu_project.html)
tpu
intel larrabee fails as a gpu project (http://www.overclockaholics.com/110005/intel_larrabee_fails_as_a_gpu_project.html)
intel's (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/#) ambitious attempts at building a discrete gpu have been shelved, as reports emerge of the company canceling the silicon's first implementation as a gpu, but rather as a "software (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/#) development platform for internal and external use." in a statement issued to internetnews.com, intel spokesperson nick knupffer explained the company's current position of larrabee, saying that development of larrabee's silicon (the chip) and software were behind schedules. "larrabee silicon and software development are behind where we hoped to be at this point in the project," he said. "as a result, our first larrabee product will not be launched as a stand-alone, discrete graphics product, rather it will be used as a software development platform for internal and external use."
larrabee as a discrete gpu made a lot of news in its short public-life, it was given much credibility as it was coming from intel, an it industry heavyweight. Earlier this year, intel demonstrated a larrabee-based product (including actual product design of the "larrabee card"), at last month's sc'09 show. The company seemed to have avoided calling it a discrete gpu, instead a "computational co-processor for the intel xeon (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/#) and core families." it was reasonable in calling it that, since by design, larrabee is a many-core processor (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/#) which uses 32 ia cores interconnected by caches. At sc'09, intel demonstrated its computational power which peaked at over 1 tflop, but not before overclocking it. » read full story (http://www.overclockaholics.com/110005/intel_larrabee_fails_as_a_gpu_project.html)
tpu