![]() |
Quote:
|
|
Neo,
follow the rabbit |
GOOOOOOAT
|
Try contacting him here http://www.erodov.com/forums/members/thebanik/
Good Ruck, if it doesnt work out, Jew got da powa. |
Quote:
|
thanks for the link kal just tried a pm...says he was active 12 minutes ago
|
Quote:
Last time here was October last year, worst than me :P Jew ship wam wet? |
Splave. Only thing I remember about pushing the New AMD APUs...
Unlike previous generations CPUNB did not make as huge a differnce, however HTLINK needed to be pushed higher (its been awhile) IIRC 4K is doable Only A series I ran was a cheapo and it had a Asrock mobo so could not even run 1866 mem speed. (which is ironic since the memory records are set on llano IIRC) I know you guys love them AsRocks, I have just had 0 luck with them :( Just poked around. NB=GPU voltage also. and for running HTREF clocks up stick with IDE mode and use DVI or HDMI video output as they are all tied together (that might have been part of my problem before I stuck with SATA and VGA as it was a PC I was putting together for someone else) Found that out from SAmi over at THG... http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...uide,3260.html I actually learned something from it. I thought RAM was hitting 4 ranks already and was pushing towards 8 ranked dimms. I just looked and my DDR2 is single rank, and my DDR3 does not say. ... But AMD has had better bank interleaving than Intel for a while. Actually, I am pretty sure that is how it works, thats how NAND works. They have not gotten "faster" per se, they have just serialized more. What LOOKS like a single NAND cell now is actually 2 or 4 NAND cells in a single package. Pretty sure DRAM is the same, double sided double density RAM would be 4 ranks on a single stick. DDR4 is looking to push that to the next level with bottom end starting at 2133MHz and point to point topology instead of "channels" |
All times are GMT -10. The time now is 12:12 AM. |
Copyright ©2009 Overclockaholics.com