Ride or Die OCA4LIFE!
Log In:
Overclockaholics Forums » Overclocking Section » General Overclocking Talk » UD4 vs UD7 3Dmark2001 Sli and Single card Compared.

Notices

General Overclocking Talk General Talk...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-20-2011
Vivi's Avatar
Vivi Vivi is offline
Planning my comeback..!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 12
Vivi will become famous soon enough
Default UD4 vs UD7 3Dmark2001 Sli and Single card Compared.

Yo guys!

Getting ln2 tomorrow only.. so while i'm bored i did this.

Quck history:

I had a UD4 1st, was happy with it. But i wanted to run dual card 01, and the 16x 16x on UD7 sounded juicy. So i bought a UD7 and some of my scores went down a little. Probly because the NF200 chip not so good for single card. It's also not so good dual card. (only tested 2001 though).

So i compared results from UD4 VS UD7.

All my tests done at SAME speeds. Everything identical.

System:

Gigabyte P67A-UD4-B3 and P67A-UD7-B3
Corsair 2000mhz cl7 memory (1066 7-7-7-20 1T)
Corsair 950W psu
2600k (5.015ghz)
2x MSI 275 Lightnings (750 / 1250)

Just some pointers when using 182.50 nvidia drivers and P67 boards you need to use the sli hack to make sli work. And if you want to overvolt msi 275 lightnings on 182.50 drivers use madmatrix tool.

Here we go:

UD4 Left / UD7 Right (Single Card)




Full Screenshot

UD4 Screenshot
UD7 Screenshot


UD4 Left / UD7 Right (Dual Card)




Full Screenshot

UD4 Screenshot
UD7 Screenshot

The difference is quite big. The higher you go with cpu speed the bigger the difference will get.
Seems like UD4 slacks a LITTLE in nature dualcard. But the other tests make more than up for it.

Cool
__________________
Quote:
you ln2 guys are sick - Splave 06-26-2009

Last edited by Vivi; 04-20-2011 at 02:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-20-2011
Chuchnit's Avatar
Chuchnit Chuchnit is offline
MIA POML
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Work
Posts: 4,307
Rep Power: 17
Chuchnit will become famous soon enough
Default

Now the question is if you gain mhz by switching to the UD7 to make up the difference.
__________________


http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=5&pictureid=13
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-20-2011
Neuromancer's Avatar
Neuromancer Neuromancer is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,645
Rep Power: 18
Neuromancer might just be on to something hereNeuromancer might just be on to something here
Default

Interested to see how this effects newer tests that are not GPU phobic. Like Heaven
__________________
"Don't You understand? This is Greek to me! Except I spek Greek, this is like Aramaic to me, and not the Western Dialect I can read a little." - Dr. Walter Bishop

Special relativity is not "Eat Two Big Macs."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-20-2011
Vivi's Avatar
Vivi Vivi is offline
Planning my comeback..!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 12
Vivi will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuchnit View Post
Now the question is if you gain mhz by switching to the UD7 to make up the difference.
no sadly not :/
that was the main reason i went to ud7. to gain CPU speed.

but,

max on UD4 5705mhz
max on UD7 5705mhz
__________________
Quote:
you ln2 guys are sick - Splave 06-26-2009
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-20-2011
Witchdoctor's Avatar
Witchdoctor Witchdoctor is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,039
Rep Power: 18
Witchdoctor will become famous soon enough
Default

How does 2D compare ???
__________________
You don't need a reason to help people
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-20-2011
Vivi's Avatar
Vivi Vivi is offline
Planning my comeback..!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 12
Vivi will become famous soon enough
Default

for me 2D the UD4 was faster.

UD4
5705 - Pi - 6.500
5705 - Pifast - 12.88

UD7
5705 - Pi - 6.531
5705 - Pifast - 12.91
__________________
Quote:
you ln2 guys are sick - Splave 06-26-2009
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-20-2011
Witchdoctor's Avatar
Witchdoctor Witchdoctor is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,039
Rep Power: 18
Witchdoctor will become famous soon enough
Default

Damm,

Wonder what gives when their mid line board out prforms the flagship ???

better times = clocks ... WTF are they doing to market this

2x 16 would be all it has going for it over the ud4 ???

guess it has giga teaming and the whole smeal though ...

plus the way cool box ..........
__________________
You don't need a reason to help people
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-20-2011
Splave's Avatar
Splave Splave is offline
Beyond Help
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,331
Rep Power: 19
Splave will become famous soon enough
Default

nf200 ftl?
__________________
2nd place in SPi32m

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivi View Post
when those trolls start making love your VGA has no chance!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-20-2011
ReverendMaynard's Avatar
ReverendMaynard ReverendMaynard is offline
Senior Overclockaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,492
Rep Power: 13
ReverendMaynard is just getting started
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave View Post
nf200 ftl?
we have a winner.
__________________
Rockin the AMD...: P


Gutterz: He laid the sausage on it , but this wasnt an SS
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-20-2011
Chuchnit's Avatar
Chuchnit Chuchnit is offline
MIA POML
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Work
Posts: 4,307
Rep Power: 17
Chuchnit will become famous soon enough
Default

I still don't get why it's slower in 2d? NF200 should only affect 3D shouldn't it?
__________________


http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=5&pictureid=13
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -10. The time now is 11:58 PM.

Copyright 2009-2014, Overclockaholics

Designed by: vBSkinworks