Overclockaholics Forums

Overclockaholics Forums (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/index.php)
-   OCA Contest Discussions (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=93)
-   -   [CORE i7]Overclockaholics Super_PI_Mod_v1.6_32M LCC "Official Discussion" (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=891)

HITandRUN 07-26-2009 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kal-el (Post 11550)


in reviewing the totality of the situation, this is the most "fair" decision that can be rendered and the most "accountable" action taken to preserve the integrity of the remaining portions of this contest.

fortunately it was caught very early in the contest and the adjustment made without impacting any one bencher's overall standings.

in the scenario “a re-bench w/1.51cpu-z is implemented”, the only competitor that stands to lose is rickss69. Every other competitor has demonstrated an improved pi score after moving to cpu-z 1.51.

here are the current standings:
1- drnip 920 do 10m 49.453s
2- rickss69 950 do 10m56.500s
3- romdominance 920do 11m03.906s
4- splave 920 d0 11m10.925s
5- cecil 920 11m14.764s

so in essence, a re-bench would only affect rickss69. I do not feel that the burden of validity in this instance should be placed solely on rickss. The initial rules contained an unacceptable degree of imperfection and even with the new adjustment a certain degree of imperfection will remain. It is and always will be fallable.

so in balancing the likelihood of rickss being a dishonorable bencher and the impact on the standings, i find the actions taken to be both fair and indiscriminate.

this topic will be put even more to rest when rickss posts a yet improved pi time with the new cpu-z 1.51 requirement.

i’m all for fairness and if after this explanation of the current circumstances, any competitor that is currently ranked in the standings still feels my actions are “unfair”, please feel free to voice your protest. I will re-assess the situation based on how impactful it is to those benchers already ranked. Outside of those parameters, the issue is perceived as resolved. Cpu-z 1.51 is required for all benches.
supes- cool2



amen! :d

dinos22 07-26-2009 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HITandRUN (Post 11541)
Doesn’t that leave the danger of the scores submitted with the 1.52 version being actually run at a higher speed? :Dizzy: I mean I’m sure we don’t have nobody trying to take advantage of the situation but still if there is something like this going on and its known to everybody I think everybody should submit it with the 1.51 version which would leave no doubt about the CPU speed. :thumbsup: It’s not like you need a monster LN2 session to rerun the benchies. Just my 5c to the story. Sorry everybody for putting more confusion into this but I just don’t feel this is fair at this point. :morpheus:

cheats dont mess with kal-el to_keep_order :D

Splave 07-27-2009 11:35 AM

1 Attachment(s)
any help with getting cputweaker to show mhz?

DrNip 07-27-2009 11:37 AM

Might be a Windows 7 incompatibility thing.

DrNip 07-27-2009 03:57 PM

I just got to ask as I can't get 1.52 version to glitch like this for me but are any of you running your rig with c1e, speedstep or anything like this enabled that might be causing it to do this?

rickss69 07-27-2009 04:02 PM

I never saw it either Nip. One and the same for me.

69_Goat 07-27-2009 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrNip (Post 11674)
I just got to ask as I can't get 1.52 version to glitch like this for me but are any of you running your rig with c1e, speedstep or anything like this enabled that might be causing it to do this?


It worked fine for me and I've got all that stuff turned off.

DrNip 07-27-2009 04:06 PM

I have it all turned off too. I am just wondering if it is glitching on guys that might have any of these enabled.

Splave 07-28-2009 03:18 AM

no glitch here for me, I like that its smaller lol

nips you on xp? I cant get close to your score man rofl

karmakazi 07-28-2009 04:18 AM

W00t! Been waiting for this one guys cool2

Just got the MSI Eclipse Plus insulated. Hope kingston can get me my hypers back quick from RMA (will be seeing if they scale with LN2 muahaha)!!! Otherwise its time for high QPI + D9GTR's... :D

Good luck to everyone:thumbsup:

DrNip 07-28-2009 04:32 AM

Yep I'm on XP. I brought my jedi skillz to the table this time. Thinking I might have to hook up my pot to get the cpu cooler so I can run an 18 mult with RAM at 2140MHz. :D

Cecil 07-28-2009 07:50 AM

Wish I had some faster memory. These wont go over 1750ish.

DrNip 07-28-2009 07:50 AM

That's what it comes down too.

RomDominance 07-28-2009 08:12 AM

:sign15::poopinghorse::green8:

I am not goin with that....I'm running my GT's at 2016MHz 7-7-7-18 54 1T , my uncore at 25x 4200+ as leaned and tweaked as it gets and can't get below
11m2s.....whats the deal?:shock:

karmakazi 07-28-2009 08:24 AM

Rom what tweaks are you using?

ReverendMaynard 07-28-2009 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RomDominance (Post 11774)
:sign15::poopinghorse::green8:

I am not goin with that....I'm running my GT's at 2016MHz 7-7-7-18 54 1T , my uncore at 25x 4200+ as leaned and tweaked as it gets and can't get below
11m2s.....whats the deal?:shock:

word, and Win7 destroys XP in 32m.

karmakazi 07-28-2009 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReverendMaynard (Post 11777)
word, and Win7 destroys XP in 32m.

Yeah that will explain slow times.... gotta have 2k3 or xp, its really a must if you wish to compete.

Quote:

Originally Posted by karmakazi (Post 11729)
W00t! Been waiting for this one guys cool2

Just got the MSI Eclipse Plus insulated. Hope kingston can get me my hypers back quick from RMA (will be seeing if they scale with LN2 muahaha)!!! Otherwise its time for high QPI + D9GTR's... :D

Good luck to everyone:thumbsup:

HAHA Kingston comes through.... just got this in my inbox! Please dont end it before 8/3 pretty pretty please with sprinkles on top :)

Scheduled Delivery Date:
08/03/2009
Shipped To:
BUFFALO, NY, US
Shipped/Billed On:
07/27/2009
Type:
Package
Service:
GROUND
Weight:
1.20 Lbs

Splave 07-28-2009 08:37 AM

windows 7 x32 is way faster than xp and 7 x64. Never tryed server 2k3 though. :D

ReverendMaynard 07-28-2009 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splave (Post 11781)
windows 7 x32 is way faster than xp and 7 x64. Never tryed server 2k3 though. :D

what spliggity said.

On my top end 32m, Win 7 32b beats XP tweaked to the nuts by approx. 20sec.

Chuchnit 07-28-2009 08:46 AM

Are you guys stripping XP down proper? I would imagine if Win 7 was truly faster than XP we would see win7 at the top rankings in hwbot. As it stands now 2k3 server and XP rule the roost. Got any screenies for comparison?

karmakazi 07-28-2009 08:54 AM

I think (or hope) that they are joking chuch

DrNip 07-28-2009 08:59 AM

I will do a run on my Windows 7 HDD for comparison between my XP run and it.

karmakazi 07-28-2009 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrNip (Post 11787)
I will do a run on my Windows 7 HDD for comparison between my XP run and it.

Would be nice for reference, but I would literally shat myself if 7 is faster:Dizzy:

ReverendMaynard 07-28-2009 09:10 AM

start "shatting".

karmakazi 07-28-2009 09:13 AM

lol we will see

Splave 07-28-2009 09:14 AM

Each bench ran 3 times taking the best score for each

-Operating systems-
XP Beast Edition with reg tweaks only (no max mem, or large sys cache)
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 no tweaks
Windows 7 Ultimate x32 no tweaks

-Benchies-
::Wprime 32m
::Wprime 1024m
::Superpi 1m
::Superpi 32m
::PiFast

-Setup-
::i7 920 d0 @ 200.5x21 = 4210mhz (201 set in bios)
::eVGA classified 4/17/2009 bios
::Kingston HyperX ddr3-2000 cas 9 @ 802mhz 8-8-8-24-1t
::Sparkle 9800gtx 512mb
::HEC Cougar 1kw
::3x Western digital caviar drives (same model, and caches, different sizes 320 300 250)

::wPrime 32m::
1st 5.179 XP
2nd 5.876 W7 x32
3rd 5.967 W7 x64

::wPrime 1024m::
1st 182.123 W7 x64
2nd 182.155 XP
3rd 183.657 W7 x32

::Superpi 1m::
1st 9.609 XP
2nd 9.641 W7 x32
3rd 9.672 W7 x64

::Superpi 32m::
1st 8:50.516 W7 x32
2nd 8:54.344 W7 x64
3rd 9:06.219 XP

::Pifast::
1st 20.11 XP
2nd 20.16 W7 x32
3rd 20.19 W7 x64


Have screens but why would I lie lol


In other news lol, Ive never shaved any time using maxmem in any os. Thought 600mb is standard for 32m? 1st time I gained 5 seconds seconds

karmakazi 07-28-2009 09:20 AM

Well your XP isnt properly tweaked then

I can do a clock for clock comparison with reverendmaynard's best time on hwbot. He has 8m25.xxx s @ 4505Mhz in Windows 7

I will use XPSP3 or 2k3 maybe both if I have time

In other news ill beat it by at least 3 seconds same clocks/ram etc ;)

And im not just making numbers up. Use performance product (PP) calculation to estimate your pi efficiency (cpu clock * pi time in seconds). You can then extrapolate/interpolate times at different clock speeds. The lower the PP the better your efficiency.

Im at work so I can only use examples from hwbot profiles. For instance in Reverend's run, 505.680 seconds * 4505 cpu = 2278088.4 PP

Versus my run 421.3 seconds * 5009 cpu = 2154768.7 PP

If you want to see my pi time at 4505 simply substitute... x * 4505 = 2154768.7. X=478.306 seconds. So I should theoretically be able to beat that score by a half minute or so. Now if I match my ram clocks to his that gap would of course close a little, but XP is still faster.

ReverendMaynard 07-28-2009 09:20 AM

win XP 32m copy wazza, 14 processes, tweaked to almost lost functionality.
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=840922

7 32b, no tweaks.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=852711

bit of a frquency deficit as well.

same timings, really no other changes...except that it's on a different mobo, but honestly, the Gigabyte board is out right faster clock for clock regardless.

We can throw down lots, and lots of stuff to back this up so expect a flood from the boys.

We wouldn't run it if it was slower. Maybe all these pro's just haven't figured out how to hack 7 to get an edge over us "n00bs". ;)

ReverendMaynard 07-28-2009 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karmakazi (Post 11793)
Well your XP isnt properly tweaked then

I can do a clock for clock comparison with reverendmaynard's best time on hwbot. He has 8m25.xxx s @ 4505Mhz in Windows 7

I will use XPSP3 or 2k3 maybe both if I have time

beat it by 20+ seconds at the same settings, timings and what not and I'll call hax lol.

karmakazi 07-28-2009 09:38 AM

Lol well your a right nasty git arent you. Im trying to help you and you give attitude. Im gonna beat it by 20 seconds and you can eat your words... :D

Im not making things up your efficiency in XP is awful, and in 7 its better, but still not good.

Looking at your screenies I see at least 5 errors slowing you down.

69_Goat 07-28-2009 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cecil (Post 11764)
Wish I had some faster memory. These wont go over 1750ish.

I'm in the same boat Cecil. I did manage to clock my 1600 ram up to 1884 with relaxed timings, but it didn't translate into better times.

karmakazi 07-28-2009 09:42 AM

Sorry for any disrespect.

Splave 07-28-2009 09:46 AM

what are the magic settings than karma? Ive dont max mem tweaking large system cache copy wazza etc and I have like 10 process on a windows install that is about 3oombs. what are you going to do different?

karmakazi 07-28-2009 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splave (Post 11800)
what are the magic settings than karma? Ive dont max mem tweaking large system cache copy wazza etc and I have like 10 process on a windows install that is about 3oombs. what are you going to do different?

LOL im just supposed to spill the beans huh? Ive combed more forums in more languages than I care to count to assemble my pi tweaks. You mention 3 things. Im not gonna give away the cake but if you want to try to find some useful things...

Look in the registry (I use over 25 reg tweaks), look in device manager, my pi install is 6 services and 7 processes and 92mb, certain ram subtimings have a big impact, OS appearance, priority&affinity, pagefile, copywaza file size, among many more that I dont give out in public forums anyways.

For socket 775 a good one to try is Pmem to change MCH strap offset registers (can shave seconds off a run).

Pi tweaking is about taking your time and really experimenting. Superpi is a very sensitive program that responds to very slight changes in your OS and BIOS settings. In total I probably use 50 or more tweaks for a proper run. Takes some time to get it all done, but I use images and a IDE/SATA hdd dock to keep times <5mins for a OS reimage.

DrNip 07-28-2009 09:54 AM

I will release my tweaks after the competition. Pretty much I am only doing 5 tweaks. Only one of them is a registry tweak.

Chuchnit 07-28-2009 09:55 AM

[puts on hat]

Gents, lets keep it clean and to the facts. If you have proof for the pudding then post it up. No need to start getting personal. Consider this a warning for no further attacks.

[/takes off hat]

Karmakazi, we are all about sharing information around here. If you got something you want to share, then share away :)

Maybe we need to start a thread to do some real performance evaluation between the two OS's? Of course you have to compare with proper tweaks applied; not fresh full install to fresh full install.

ReverendMaynard 07-28-2009 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karmakazi (Post 11799)
Please show me something good ;) Oh and I never said I was a pro at all, you did. In fact many people know lots more about pi tweaking than I do. I was going to try and give a few helpful pointers, but with your attitude, you can frankly shove it up your arse

Did putting the word pro is italics somehow make that a reference too you karma?

Before telling people to shove attitudes up their arses, check yours. :thumbdown:

ReverendMaynard 07-28-2009 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuchnit (Post 11804)
[puts on hat]
Karmakazi, we are all about sharing information around here. If you got something you want to share, then share away :)

Maybe we need to start a thread to do some real performance evaluation between the two OS's? Of course you have to compare with proper tweaks applied; not fresh full install to fresh full install.


Great idea Chuch!

Splave 07-28-2009 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karmakazi (Post 11802)
LOL im just supposed to spill the beans huh? Ive combed more forums in more languages than I care to count to assemble my pi tweaks. You mention 3 things. Im not gonna give away the cake but if you want to try to find some useful things...

Look in the registry (I use over 25 reg tweaks), look in device manager, my pi install is 6 services and 7 processes and 92mb, certain ram subtimings have a big impact, OS appearance, priority&affinity, pagefile, copywaza file size, among many more that I dont give out in public forums anyways, much less to arrogant people :thumbsup:

Wasnt being arrogant just want to learn. Imo secret tweaks :thumbdown:

karmakazi 07-28-2009 10:04 AM

OK so because I did the leg work (at least 300+ hours reading crappy google translations, and another 100+ hours testing) I should just give it to you ? NONE of my tweaks are "secrets" they can ALL be found PUBLICALLY on the internet. I wasnt refering to you being arrogant, your a cool person from what Ive seen you post here and @ XS, I was referring to reverend. Maybe I will give some out AFTER the 32M comp publically. Otherwise you can speak to me on MSN if you want to know something more.

Im a levelheaded and nice person, totally willing to help people. But I will stand up for what I know to be right also.


All times are GMT -10. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Copyright ©2009 Overclockaholics.com