lets hope so :thumbsup:

really tho.. i have a lotta of hardware but just DON'T have the time to bench it, and now i just quite my job i should have more time for schooling and benching and for my ladies too i am EXCITED!!

WPrime is definitely not better on XP. ;) Welcome aboard.

All my wprime/spi runs are on xp. :)

xp here too

Yes wprime gives me better results on xp than 7x64 but i havent test it on vista yet

Well, I get several minutes faster times in (edited)1024m and up to ~ a minute faster in (edited)32m using Tiny7x32....at least on socket 939.

Never tested with a more modern socket. I just ran it in 7 on my 920 too.

EDIT: now I will have to go home and run some WPrime on the 920 with xp and 7..............it seems kinda strange/illogical that more modern hardware would give better results using an older OS when older hardware gives better results using a newer OS.

I tested it on the 920 with everything set to defaults and OS in normal mode. TinyXPx32 wins by quite a bit over Tiny7x32on this platform. Avg of ~.4 sec in 32m, and ~8 sec in 1024m.

Must be an anomoly of the socket 939 architecture. Sure am glad I figured that out. ;)

Of course it couldn't be that you're doing something wrong.:D
XP is faster on the 939's also.

I beg to differ. :D See below examples.
And check out the other 6 golds I have in wprime if you need more proof.:taunt:

EDIT: Believe me I ran them all in XP first and was 4-5 seconds slower.

http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/...TypeId=CPU_711

http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/...=cpubenchmarks

http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/...TypeId=CPU_712

http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/...=cpubenchmarks

xp is still faster :D :taunt: