Overclockaholics Forums

Overclockaholics Forums (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Overclocking Talk (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=90)
-   -   wPrime (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=233)

spfoam1 03-25-2009 02:15 PM

wPrime
 
Here are two wPrime runs. Both were done with an E8500 CPU on an Abit IP35 Pro board. Both were done at exactly the same CPU and RAM settings. The only difference between the two is the number of threads the benchmark was set to run. I ran both several times to be sure the score was not abnormal for any reason.

This one was set at two threads
http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/m...etat2cores.jpg

This one was set at 4 threads
http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/m...etat4cores.jpg

Jeffro64 03-25-2009 03:57 PM

I tried that and got a higher score.:confused:

DrNip 03-25-2009 04:18 PM

Yeah for some reason it runs better on 4 cores even when you have a dual core.

Jeffro64 03-25-2009 04:22 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here's a little better... but only at 4 threads.

Kal-EL 03-25-2009 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffro64 (Post 1306)
Here's a little better... but only at 4 threads.

Hey, that looks like good voltage bud for 4ghz on that chip. You might have a keeper. :D

Jeffro64 03-25-2009 08:31 PM

I think it will go a couple below that.... I think I raised it up trying to figure out that BSOD issue I was having and never put it back down.

Komadyret 03-25-2009 08:43 PM

Good to know I'm not alone in this, I have looked briefly into this wprime stuff myself.

In Vista at stock speed my E8400 acctually had it's fastest wprime with 16!!! threads, consistently.
With a 4.5GHz OC it ran fastest with 4 and 6 threads. Couldn't really find any consistent winner, but optimal threadcount was much different than for stock speeds.

My point; the optimal thread count is different for different chip-architechture, and it changes with the overclock of the cpu. This bench needs a few runs at various threadcounts to establish where it will run best. Also keep in mind that you should run it at least 4 or 5 times. Sometimes run #2 or run #3 or run #4 will go considerably faster (~1/2 tenth of a second faster for a core2 duo?) that the others.

DrNip 04-23-2009 08:37 AM

Just a heads up, on the i7's run it with a 8 thread count as it beats out the 4 thread count.

G H Z 07-10-2009 02:11 PM

wPrime is not consistent (like all other benchmarks) only the differences are somewhat amplified because it's running 2, 4, 8 or more threads. I do have one team mate who swears by the over-threaded approach.

crustytheclown 07-10-2009 04:24 PM

That makes two of us - I also know a guy who is an avid supporter of the over-threaded approach.

thebanik 07-10-2009 06:53 PM

^^^isnt overclocking commnity pretty small???, maybe you two are talking about the same guy???

Deanzo 07-10-2009 08:28 PM

Well hwbot has 857 teams, with a total of 15549 members.
So it's not that small.

punx223 07-10-2009 08:32 PM

my e8600 no matter the clock has been best at 4 threads

Shahryar_NEO 07-11-2009 06:01 AM

always set your threads on wPrime double your logical cores .

so if you use i7s use 8 thread and if you use C2D use 4 . another things is important is your OS !

ReverendMaynard 09-14-2009 09:51 AM

I thought it was pretty common knowledge that wprime needs to be set by threads, not cores....

Neuromancer 09-14-2009 04:47 PM

Think its an intel only thing (I do not know for sure). Did not improve my times at all setting 8 threads on my AMD quads.

Seen a lot of guys with e8XXX say set 4 threads it helps. Have not seen any AMD guys saying that though.


All times are GMT -10. The time now is 04:06 AM.


Copyright ©2009 Overclockaholics.com