Overclockaholics Forums

Overclockaholics Forums (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/index.php)
-   Intel (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   Sneak peak at EVGA's new dual socket 2011 motherboard. SR-?? :) (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4866)

HybridChiller 10-20-2011 06:54 PM

Sneak peak at EVGA's new dual socket 2011 motherboard. SR-?? :)
 
.....

OC Maximus 10-20-2011 07:38 PM

I see lots of red......

kikicoco1334 10-20-2011 09:48 PM

i ejaculated in my pants when i first saw that

(for the ones who don't know i am a HUGE FAN of mix of BLACK AND RED)

Kal-EL 10-20-2011 10:43 PM

Wow, exciting prospect of a motherboard.

HybridChiller 10-21-2011 12:08 AM

i updated the pic, bigger, more detail to see then :scared:

Me like this board hhhhmmmmmm :clapping:

Splave 10-21-2011 03:12 AM

SR-X baby, supposed to work with desktop chips!

HybridChiller 10-21-2011 04:29 AM

you think?

i think only Xeon cpu with dual QPI link for communication

Splave 10-21-2011 05:07 AM

sandy bridge E doesnt have dual link qpi ;) thats why it should work

sr-x or sr-3

Kal-EL 10-21-2011 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splave (Post 84472)
sandy bridge E doesnt have dual link qpi ;) thats why it should work

sr-x or sr-3

SRX-E aint she?

MaadDaawg 10-21-2011 06:47 AM

I read somewhere that it used desktop chips and didn't require dual QPI - FTW :D Maybe I'll be able to afford one ?? :thumbsup:

Witchdoctor 10-21-2011 06:55 AM

Don't like the SATA interface, some cards will block them off. I do not see high end GPU's getting any shorter, looks like any cards that exceed 10.25 inches will have an impact this design ..........


GTX580 10.5 inches

GTX 480 10.5 inches

5870 11.1 inches

6970 11 inches

6990 12 inches

590 11 inches

punx223 10-21-2011 07:16 AM

it looks like Dual X79 chips.... which would make sense... basically 2 seperate systems fused on one board.

looks very interesting.

Splave 10-21-2011 07:24 AM

going by rough measurements (ie pci-e slot = 4inches) you can determine there is about 11.5 inches to the ports :) but i agree seems like there should be a better way.

Witchdoctor 10-21-2011 07:41 AM

That is possible splig, Are the hold down holes different than standard ATX ? as they are 9.5" from the edge of the board to the center of the hole.

That is what I was basing my comment on. If so than it would only interfere with dual GPU solutions ....

Still silly they would not follow what these days seems to be an industry standard iliminating this conflict using offset SATA ports

Neuromancer 10-22-2011 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaadDaawg (Post 84476)
I read somewhere that it used desktop chips and didn't require dual QPI - FTW :D Maybe I'll be able to afford one ?? :thumbsup:

Would be cool, AFAIK only the 8 core desktop chips will have dual QPI.


FYI if you do not like the 6 SATA ports, why not use the 4 90degree angle SAS/SATA ports at the far corner of the board?


I see people complaining about cable managment wit hthe "normal" SATA ports, they are forgetting this is a SERVER sized board and will not fit in any ATX case that exists, only server chassis... in which case the SATA sockets should be fine

Although we will see, hints are these CPUs will not come with air coolers, so not sure what server cases are going to come out with spots for Watercooling :)

HybridChiller 12-04-2011 09:05 PM

if it's desktop cpu's, i will have one lol.

Will have all the SR-* baby's in the house.

Witchdoctor 12-04-2011 11:16 PM

Agree, if it uses regular chips it will kick some multithreaded ass

MaadDaawg 12-05-2011 04:05 AM

I hope it'll take a mix of the X and K processors, can't afford another 3960X :rofl:

Witchdoctor 12-05-2011 04:34 AM

I can't afford 1 .............. :ohcrap:


All times are GMT -10. The time now is 09:08 AM.


Copyright ©2009 Overclockaholics.com