OCZ Vertex 4 512gb
 

I just picked one up. I was running 4 60gb Vertex 3's in my gamer in RAID 0 and one just keeps droppping out. 3 times was 3 times to many. So i decided to just go with a single drive and i wanted space. So i picked up the 512. The thing rocks for a single drive and the supprt over at OCZ forums is awesome.

Some benchmarks.

Nice Drive mang :thumbsup:

512gb ssd, grats.

Thx for sharing the info!
512 is beastly, how much it run u?

5 bills on my New Egg account. There are a few over at XS for sale for 3 bills i was looking at. But I just decided not to go with used.

The reason i went with the 512 besides space is that, like any drive once you get past 50-60% they start to slow down. Even more so with platter drives.

As far as life length....It will last long enough that when its too old to use, the technology will be so obsolete that you'll want something else anyway.

I've had trouble like yours with 60GB SSDs in RAID. A real PITA :P

Should probably sell the RAID card :morpheus:

Was trying to determine just how long would one last... would hate to invest $500 in a drive that was toast after 12 months.

Interesting read... http://phys.org/news/2012-12-taiwan-...emory.html#jCp

I don't use my Raid card anymore. The intel Raid is better. Especially now that it has 6gb speeds. Only reason i bought a RAID card was for pc05 benching. I never used it for d my daily. One reason was the extremly slow load time.

@Rick...I am sure it would last alot longer than 12 months. How long will it last? I have really never looked into it. But this one has a 5 year warranty. I'll probably want something else by then. lol

Any downside to one of these? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820147190

I see the 3 year warranty on the Samsung, but having difficulty finding the specifics of the 5 year OCZ.

I would have to think the 840 would be better than the 830, but I do not know that. I do know if you can find an 830 are freaking rockets as I have two of them

Sammies are all I use these days, never even had so much as a hicup with them

Look s like a good deal, found some 830's over at Amozon, but they want like 5 bills for them :ohcrap:

Bastards ..............

I'm still stuck using 4x 128 GB drives by committy :blush:

http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-ver....html#overview

Warranty
http://www.ocztechnology.com/support/warranty/

I get reads and writes

so what is Iops ? see that a lot..


Always thought it was a place to eat breakfast .........................:laughing:

Edit:

@ HOF

Just found this, bet he would take $ 275.00


.53 cents a gig

http://forums.extremeoverclocking.co...d.php?t=366521

IOPS = Input/Output Operations Per Second

how does that effect the read / wrie performance, as Many of the Max op's drive are on par with everything else out there, right around 500/300 give or take a few

Some reading material. Cause i don't have the answers. lol

http://recoverymonkey.org/2012/07/26...s-and-latency/

So just another number to confuse the consumer and typically a usless number unless paired with a latenancy figure, and being all the manufactures use different latancy figures if any at all it is meaningless to try to compair drive a to drive b unless the same latancy is used for the comparison ............



Kool ........... :blink:

Good read bro

Thanks ... :thumbsup:

One hundred billion IOPS…

:rofl

Hey does that bench work wit hdd?

My WD Black was 25 minutes into it and I said eff it ......... LOL

Yes.

It takes my SSD about 1 min 20sec.

Hahahahahahaha its taking forebber to run!!

Not terribly inspiring huh?

Attachment 6601

lmao Probably dosn't feel that slow when ur running them though. Besides its a benchmark for ssd's not hdd's so i'm sure that has something to do with it. Try Atto. http://www.attotech.com/products/pro...Disk_Benchmark

Link wants me to register my kids before downloading. We got this one on the ftp?

Sorry try this. I'll put it on the FTP also. Run it on stock settings.


http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads...k%20v2.46.html

Howz this?
Attachment 6603

Pretty good for hdd's. :thumbsup:

Do you have disk indexing disabled? Are those in RAID 0? Whats your stripe size? Eight of them right?

My single Seagate Barracuda 500gb.

My WD 1TB -

http://i434.photobucket.com/albums/q...g/Atto-1TB.jpg

Its a few years old install, pretty sure I disabled indexing. Raid 0, thought I had 8 but its 6 in raid 0 and two pass thru drives. Stripe is 4k.

The indilinx controller drops in speed when doing s a sustained transfer of over 50% free space reminaing , not once it is 50% full. EG When empty if you transfer 300GB to the 512GB drive teh first 256GB transfers at full speed the remainder drops in performance

Another EG... the drive is 256GB full. you will have full performance with writes up to 128GB in transfer space. 200GB would run 128 at full and the remainder at reduced rates. (about HDD speeds)

this only effects write speed BTW...

Read performance is never effected by amount of data on the drive.

Write performance will remain consistent up to the size of the nand used on the PCB.
If 8x16GB NANDs are used the drive performans flawlessly until less than 16GB remains free. After that point it can no longer write equally to all nand cells. Bear in mind it STILL does. so performance does not drop a hell of a lot.

the Vertex 4 drives are the only drives that i know that drop from sustained writes...

http://www.techreaction.net/wp-conte...aida-write.jpg

Had to go back a ways to show a aida64linear write chart. owc eXTREME PRO 6g

http://www.techreaction.net/wp-conte...ida-write1.jpg

Perfect performance from start to finish. thats the sandforce controller though not the marvell, I mean indilinx used in the Vertex 4




While it is true that SSDs will drop in performance a small amount as they fuill up it is no where close to how much HDDs do.

I stand corected. Thanks