![]() |
[CORE 2]Overclockaholics Super_PI_Mod_v1.6_32M LCC "Official Discussion"
|
Don’t want to be picky or anything but the first entered score uses CPUZ 1.51 instead the 1.52 stated in the rules. I don’t know how tight you are with the rules? :) Also on the top is says Core 2 Quad competition and the first entry uses a Core 2 Duo CPU. Does that mean we are allowed to use both? It’s a little misleading. :blink: :thumbsup:
|
Thx buddy, cpuz-1.52 is whats needed for the competition.
Any Core 2 cpu may enter. There is but a single score currently posted in the core2 section and by default of only submission, ranks #1 with incorrect cpu-z. It'll soon change as people get off their duffs to submit scores. Congrats on your premium membership btw :D |
I will update and re-run bench. Thanks
|
Quote:
|
Kal - Please delete the previous score as I have updated cpu-z and re-run the bench...with an improvement on the score btw. :) Thanks
|
Noted!
|
Quote:
|
I've done stranger things, lol.
But yah, I'll be deciding when the round is ending and provide a 48 hour window to benchers to finish up their Round 1 benches. |
wow... i gotta get my rig put back together and dammit i hope she still works lol
|
nice run rick btw
|
Quote:
|
your runnning a very good fsb and I will be at a disadvantage being DDRII but dont take that for granted as I will hold nothing back!!!
im coming for you :morpheus: |
Hey Rickster, you forgot the little notpad thingy in that second submission.
|
Very nice results until now, not the best but nice!
Keep 32Ming it lol :) |
hey guys i saw the discussion on the other thread.... since the core2 is ok with 1.52 cpuz
because i dont have a copy of 1.51... i have 1.52... if its required can someone drop me a copy? |
btw i will be doing my best but something is sick/hurt in my rig... i cant even run 6x multi
|
Link for cpuz 1.51: http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpuz/cpuz_151.zip
|
Quote:
thanks bro!!! |
really disappointing that we have to 100 post count to enter the contest .
Do you want to open a real contest or only your active members contest ? I think it's a invitation to everybody spam on your forum because they want to enter the contest . increasing the post count is not so hard but forum credit will increase by it members articles , discussions and ... . it's a way that you deny pro overclockers like hipro or ... to enter this contest . It was my idea but forgive me if were rude or impolite . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That was a very good run Rommy! Now go away...:taunt:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Couldn't put it any better than that supes. Shahryar_NEO, I do understand your frustrations being a non-native english speaker. As Kal-EL said, we aren't here to have a bunch of spammers to increase our post count. This place was made for like minded people to have our own place to hang out, AND push people over the edge... cool2 If you look at it from another angle, the post count requirements as they keep increasing for each contest, keep the spammers away or at the least make it obvious at their motives. Thank you very much for your very valuable input. I hope that you see where we are coming from. |
Thanks for you reply . :thumbsup:
Personally I think that if it's overclocking contest it has to choice the best overclocker with only technical limitation like clock speed and ... . because your forum is friendly form and everybody checked it will love it to returned but this work in my thoughts is a filter that you can only choose your best overclocker in your active members . :blush: btw , I'm really happy that you open many contests one after other . I try to participate on it and have a great time with my friends here :Hi: |
Quote:
EDIT: sorry didnt read the 3rd page first |
Sorry to double post, but I think you guys would love the new HCE @hwbot. Im a member of the staff/development forums there so I can fill in some "top secret details." Please dont leak it around out of respect to hwbot crew (I only post here cuz this is a closed forum).
Members will be able to setup competitions restricting clocks, hardware, etc. Give it a customized Title (I.e. OCA 32M LCC 2009) and the winners will get specialized trophys for their hwbot profiles. hwbot sponsored contests the winners will get hwboints too (or compboints or sometihng). Its going to be a very cool platform for sure! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I posted in the hwbot forums when I first caught wind of this new engine and details were pretty much SHHHHHH DON"T TELL, lol. It sounds very cool, interesting and awesome. When we first opened up shop here at Overclockaholics, we were kicking around the idea of approaching Rich to license the hwbot code for mini-competitions and to track our members benchmarks here at overclockaholics.com. If you get a chance to discuss it with him, see if it'd be feasible to implement a small engine for forums like us to have a site specific ranking system for our members. |
Quote:
I would be really doubtful that RB would license the hwbot code to anyone, unless it was in a smaller restricted/neutered form. Even if he was willing to do so, hes such a busy guy you wouldnt see it till 2011 probably lol. |
Sweet!
|
Also, I sure hope my asus rampage extreme gets back in time to compete in the S775 rankings.... HURRY ASUS!
|
Quote:
|
I have a serious doudt that Shahryar_NEO time at 32M was done at 3200...No tweaks have benn made (see available memmory) and RAM are at 1200 with 5-5-5 DDR2...
Sorry to report that but i believe it is not legal (regardless of the post limit) |
Quote:
are you sure you are running LSC sorry to ask but the difference is astonishing to me start time is an indication of LSC not running or being at much different clocks. i cant think of of others unless you are really working on some weird wazza but why such a huge difference :shock: |
Quote:
|
rick why dont you test with XP man
why are you wasting those prescious seconds on W7? |
i think when you start getting low 13m times you are on the right path basically so there is a lot more tweaking required to get there
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -10. The time now is 05:36 AM. |
Copyright ©2009 Overclockaholics.com