Ride or Die OCA4LIFE!
Log In:

Notices

Extreme Overclocking No Air Or Water...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2010
Chuchnit's Avatar
Chuchnit Chuchnit is offline
MIA POML
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Work
Posts: 4,307
Rep Power: 22
Chuchnit will become famous soon enough
Default

Splig I am dying to play with AMD myself. IIRC, you want atleast 2x mem on the NB. So for 1600mhz mem you want 3200mhz NB if you can pull it off. Shouldn't be a problem with ln2 Try and work her up to 4ghz NB and you'll be in the 10's
__________________


http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=5&pictureid=13
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-30-2010
Neuromancer's Avatar
Neuromancer Neuromancer is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,645
Rep Power: 23
Neuromancer might just be on to something hereNeuromancer might just be on to something here
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuchnit View Post
Splig I am dying to play with AMD myself. IIRC, you want atleast 2x mem on the NB. So for 1600mhz mem you want 3200mhz NB if you can pull it off. Shouldn't be a problem with ln2 Try and work her up to 4ghz NB and you'll be in the 10's
According to AMD its three times actual memory speed. so 1600 RAM = 800 *3 =2400cpuNB

Nothing wrong with going 3200 though.
__________________
"Don't You understand? This is Greek to me! Except I spek Greek, this is like Aramaic to me, and not the Western Dialect I can read a little." - Dr. Walter Bishop

Special relativity is not "Eat Two Big Macs."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-30-2010
Chuchnit's Avatar
Chuchnit Chuchnit is offline
MIA POML
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Work
Posts: 4,307
Rep Power: 22
Chuchnit will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuromancer View Post
According to AMD its three times actual memory speed. so 1600 RAM = 800 *3 =2400cpuNB

Nothing wrong with going 3200 though.
Gotcha. The way I had read it in discussions between Massman, MrIcee, chew*, and Bingo (asus bios guy), they were going off effective speeds and saying triple was best. Of course AMD NB just aren't that strong so they try and settle for next best; 2x or more effective memory speed. IIRC, this was when Thuban just came out and showed its IMC strength. Are they mistaken? You are the resident AMD guru
__________________


http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=5&pictureid=13
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -10. The time now is 06:40 PM.

Copyright ©2009-2014, Overclockaholics

Designed by: vBSkinworks