[Assassin48]

No need, I'm working to get everything settle straight. I know I messed up but some take it too far, especially if I'm trying to make it right.

There is no excuses to what I did and I take full blame, once everything gets settle I will gladly leave because it won't be the same for me. But like I said, once I make everything right. Just easy on the hatfull comments even tho I know I deserve them.

[Sanmayce]

Guys,
nobody replied to my request, please tell me the right sub-forum to ask for such a favor.
My test reveals how latency and RAM bandwidth affect the fundamental HP search functions.
I thought that overclocking and tuning High-Performance search functions have much in common,
maybe I put my request on wrong address?

[Kal-EL]

Originally Posted by Sanmayce

Guys,
nobody replied to my request, please tell me the right sub-forum to ask for such a favor.
My test reveals how latency and RAM bandwidth affect the fundamental HP search functions.
I thought that overclocking and tuning High-Performance search functions have much in common,
maybe I put my request on wrong address?

Nobody seems interested, probably because they already have so many other benchmarks to work on already.

[Sanmayce]

Thank you Kal-EL, I was under the impression that searching a pattern in text was an interesting benchmark niche.

[PhIlLy ChEeSe]

Originally Posted by Sanmayce

Thank you Kal-EL, I was under the impression that searching a pattern in text was an interesting benchmark niche.

If it will raise my 2D/3D score's then sure I am Think your talking code or code writing or manipulation.

[Sanmayce]

Originally Posted by PhIlLy ChEeSe

If it will raise my 2D/3D score's then sure I am Think your talking code or code writing or manipulation.

Hi PhIlLy ChEeSe,
obviously my test is out-of-date, it won't raise anything but my greedy eyes.
I still have some hopes that an old-school overclocker will do me a favor by running the batch file waiting 10 minutes and sending a text file via email:

This is my latest strstr-showdown package (a zip archive).
File: KAZE_Trident_vs_BNDM_64_vs_Elsiane_vs_Hasherezade. zip
Size: 120 MB (126,074,306 bytes)
Size unpacked: 416 MB (436,599,966 bytes)
Size needed: 700 MB
To make the 'Trident_vs_BNDM_64_vs_Elsiane_vs_Hasherezade.txt' file simply run 'RUNME_Trident_vs_BNDM_64_vs_Elsiane_vs_Hasherezad e.bat' file.
It takes some 14minutes to complete on Core2Duo_E7500_2.93Ghz.
Of course in order to obtain decent results stop all the concurrent processes before running the test.
Also enable 100% computing power.

Hope dies last.

[PhIlLy ChEeSe]

Originally Posted by Sanmayce

Hi PhIlLy ChEeSe,
obviously my test is out-of-date, it won't raise anything but my greedy eyes.
I still have some hopes that an old-school overclocker will do me a favor by running the batch file waiting 10 minutes and sending a text file via email:

This is my latest strstr-showdown package (a zip archive).
File: KAZE_Trident_vs_BNDM_64_vs_Elsiane_vs_Hasherezade. zip
Size: 120 MB (126,074,306 bytes)
Size unpacked: 416 MB (436,599,966 bytes)
Size needed: 700 MB
To make the 'Trident_vs_BNDM_64_vs_Elsiane_vs_Hasherezade.txt' file simply run 'RUNME_Trident_vs_BNDM_64_vs_Elsiane_vs_Hasherezad e.bat' file.
It takes some 14minutes to complete on Core2Duo_E7500_2.93Ghz.
Of course in order to obtain decent results stop all the concurrent processes before running the test.
Also enable 100% computing power.

Hope dies last.

GOOD LUCK!