[DrNip]

Personally if I were you and I had a kid on the way I would have to get both. The camcorder would do stuff the camera couldn't and vise versa. I have a camera that captures video. It's alright but isn't no camcorder.

[Chuchnit]

Originally Posted by DrNip

Personally if I were you and I had a kid on the way I would have to get both. The camcorder would do stuff the camera couldn't and vise versa. I have a camera that captures video. It's alright but isn't no camcorder.

I hear ya. I just don't have the funds for both.

[clwoodwork]

Originally Posted by DrNip

Personally if I were you and I had a kid on the way I would have to get both. The camcorder would do stuff the camera couldn't and vise versa. I have a camera that captures video. It's alright but isn't no camcorder.

What DrNip said. I have a 4 yr old graddaughter and it's nice to have a dig camera in your shirt pocket for quick snaps but the camcorder is great at catching things you just can't seem to get with the camera. Buy both, you will thank yourself years from now. Plus you and the woman can always take movies in bed when you don't have anything better to do.

Peace, Chuck

[Kal-EL]

Originally Posted by clwoodwork

What DrNip said. I have a 4 yr old graddaughter and it's nice to have a dig camera in your shirt pocket for quick snaps but the camcorder is great at catching things you just can't seem to get with the camera. Buy both, you will thank yourself years from now. Plus you and the woman can always take movies in bed when you don't have anything better to do.

Peace, Chuck