Ride or Die OCA4LIFE!
Log In:

Notices

DICE & LN2 Cooling If You Have A Pot...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-22-2010
MaadDaawg's Avatar
MaadDaawg MaadDaawg is offline
Beyond Help
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,040
Rep Power: 21
MaadDaawg is on a distinguished road
Default

hey... if you threaded a few of the holes, and screwed in some long ass copper rods, you'd increase the mass of the block, adding temp stability... yeah, then you make the copper rods hollow so you can pour more LN2 down them, and, and, and :
__________________

www.maaddaawg.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-22-2010
Witchdoctor's Avatar
Witchdoctor Witchdoctor is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,039
Rep Power: 22
Witchdoctor will become famous soon enough
Default

Fission baby Fission ...............

If we had the macheinery, we could come up with some serious shit
__________________
You don't need a reason to help people
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-22-2010
Patch's Avatar
Patch Patch is offline
OCA Gladiator Retired Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Red Triangle, California
Posts: 1,800
Rep Power: 17
Patch is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FACE411 View Post
Strap a small cardboard box to the cpu, pour in ln2, it still gets cold rofl..... Someone HAS to try that...
I know a guy who did just than on the NB once, but with DICE using the cardboard cylinder from a roll of toilet paper.

If I still had my F1 I wouldn't hesitate to drill some more holes in it. Only downside would be the loss of mass. Some people say threaded holes are bad because bubbles get trapped in the threads. I say that's hogwash. LN2 ain't water - that bubble's gonna be very transient.

Vince likes a LOT of mass for temp stability and infrequent pours - that's super awesome for wprime 1024 and pi32. I don't like that much mass because you pay for it with a less responsive pot.

I've got minimal experience next to the big boys, but pot design seems to come down to finding a balance between mass and surface area while working with socket space restrictions. That "balance" leaves a lot of room for personal preference.
__________________


It exists!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-23-2010
ReverendMaynard's Avatar
ReverendMaynard ReverendMaynard is offline
Senior Overclockaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,492
Rep Power: 18
ReverendMaynard is just getting started
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Witchdoctor View Post
Looking at it MD .... if you threaded rods into it sticking up say 3 or 4 inches it may be paramount

wonder if that is the intension of the threads ???

thinking of a nuclear reactor rod drop set up if that make sence
I think the treads are there to increase surface area while the holes themselves are there to tune the mass giving the user better control.

And I agree with Patch, LN2 doesn't have surface tension like water does so bubbles breakup easier. That whole trapping theory is bs.
__________________
Rockin the AMD...: P


Gutterz: He laid the sausage on it , but this wasnt an SS

Last edited by ReverendMaynard; 04-23-2010 at 02:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-23-2010
MaadDaawg's Avatar
MaadDaawg MaadDaawg is offline
Beyond Help
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,040
Rep Power: 21
MaadDaawg is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReverendMaynard View Post
I think the treads are there to increase surface area while the holes themselves are there to tune the mass giving the user better control.

And I agree with Patch, LN2 doesn't have surface tension like water does so bubbles breakup easier. That whole trapping theory is bs.
well yeah Rev, that was my whole point and/or question. The threading adds surface area, but at the same time reduces the overall mass of the block. Wasn't worried at all about bubbles being trapped (help, help lol)

So with more surface area you'd get quicker response, with less mass, you'd get less stability... where would the trade off become beneficial.

I don't have the balls to tap out a $250 copper block anyway ... was just curious mostly
__________________

www.maaddaawg.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -10. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Copyright ©2009-2014, Overclockaholics

Designed by: vBSkinworks